CO₂ lasers excel at non-metals (acrylic, wood, MDF, leather). For stainless steel, the answer is more nuanced. This guide gives a straight, engineering-grade conclusion with oxygen-assist settings, thickness limits, realistic speeds, and when to choose a fiber laser instead.
✅ Yes — a CO₂ laser can cut thin stainless (≈1.0–1.5 mm) using oxygen assist (~1 MPa).
❌ No — it is not a replacement for a fiber laser in speed, quality, or consistency.
Why CO₂ Can (Sometimes) Cut Stainless
CO₂ wavelength (10.6 μm) is poorly absorbed by stainless; fiber (~1.06 μm) is absorbed much better. With CO₂, the cut depends heavily on oxygen’s exothermic reaction to supply extra heat and help eject molten metal. That’s why CO₂ stainless cutting is slower, with more oxidation and a wider heat-affected zone compared to fiber.
Practical Thickness Limit
| Stainless Thickness | CO₂ + O₂ Feasibility |
|---|---|
| 0.8–1.0 mm | ✅ Stable |
| 1.2–1.5 mm | ✅ Feasible but slow |
| > 2.0 mm | ❌ Not recommended |
Realistic Speed Window (with O₂ ≈ 1 MPa)
Baseline speeds assume ~90% laser power, correct focus, proper nozzle, and sound airflow. Expect ±20% variance by material grade, optics, gas quality, and setup.
| Thickness | Power | Best Speed | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 mm | 150W CO₂ + O₂ | ~30–35 mm/s | Stable cut |
| 1.2 mm | 150W | ~15–25 mm/s | Usable, slower |
| 1.5 mm | 150W | ~8–15 mm/s | Approaches upper limit |
Edge Quality Expectations
| Attribute | CO₂ (1.0–1.5 mm) | Fiber |
|---|---|---|
| Oxidation / Discoloration | Likely (yellow/brown/black) | Minimal |
| Heat-Affected Zone | Wider | Narrow |
| Dross | Possible | Low |
| Repeatability | Moderate | High |
| Speed | Slow | Fast |
| Post-processing | Often needed | Minimal |
CO₂ vs. Fiber for Stainless
| Metric | CO₂ + O₂ | Fiber Laser |
|---|---|---|
| Max practical thickness | ~1.5 mm | 20–50+ mm (by kW) |
| Throughput | Low | High |
| Edge quality | Poorer | Cleaner |
| Gas consumption | Higher | Lower |
| Consistency | Medium | High |
| Production suitability | ❌ | ✅ |
| Best use case | Prototyping / occasional | Regular stainless cutting |
When CO₂ Is Reasonable
- Hobby / prototyping
- Occasional thin stainless (≤ 1.5 mm)
- Mixed-material shop where CO₂ is primarily for non-metals
When CO₂ Is Not a Good Choice
- > 1.5 mm stainless
- Production batches / tight tolerances
- Clean, aesthetic edges with minimal post-processing
Decision Flow (Quick)
Material = Stainless?
↓ Yes
Thickness ≤ 1.5 mm?
↓ Yes
Occasional / prototyping?
↓ Yes → CO₂ + O₂ (OK)
↓ No → Fiber (recommended)
↓ No
→ Fiber laser only
Safety Notes
- Use proper oxygen regulator and rated hose
- Back-fire protection (check valve, flashback arrestor)
- Monitor heat buildup; never leave unattended
- Keep fire suppression within reach
FAQ
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Can 60–100 W CO₂ cut stainless? | Practically no for cutting; may mark/engrave only. 150W + O₂ is the realistic entry. |
| Is oxygen mandatory? | Yes. CO₂ stainless cutting relies on O₂ reaction heat and molten ejection. |
| Can CO₂ cut 2 mm stainless? | Not recommended due to speed, quality, and consistency issues. |
| Will the edge look clean? | Expect oxidation and discoloration; post-processing often needed. Fiber is cleaner. |
| When should I choose fiber? | Any regular stainless work, > 1.5 mm thickness, or when you need clean, consistent edges. |
Conclusion
Yes, a CO₂ laser can cut 1.0–1.5 mm stainless with oxygen assist (~1 MPa), but it’s slow, oxidizing, and inconsistent compared to fiber. If stainless forms a meaningful share of your workload, invest in a fiber laser.